Avice Accuses egxrdemxn During BSB 15

Published September 28, 2026

A public dispute between Artem “Avice” Temnov and Egor “egxrdemxn” Miller interrupted the BETBOOM Streamers Battle 15 playoff series between their teams. During the opening map, Avice paused the game and accused his opponent of deliberately losing matches. Egxrdemxn rejected the attack and answered by pointing to Kamil “Koma`” Biktimirov’s place on Avice Team. The exchange was broadcast and reported by several outlets, but no tournament ruling or verified evidence of misconduct was reported with it.

The distinction between an accusation and a finding is the essential fact in this story. Avice used the community shorthand “322,” which is commonly associated with match-fixing, while egxrdemxn said the allegation was causing viewers to accuse him of breaking rules and laws. That response did not resolve the claim; it showed the immediate reputational effect of making it publicly during a live match. Neither player’s statements should be treated as an independent investigation.

The argument also drew in the histories of other participants. Egxrdemxn referred to Koma`, who had previously received a lifetime Valve ban, as a reason he considered the accusation hypocritical. That background is relevant to the reply, but it does not prove anything about the series being played. Responsibility cannot be transferred from one player to another through association, and the published reports did not announce a new sanction against egxrdemxn.

What happened in the series

The confrontation began on the first map after a pause. Avice Team won that game, but Rostik Team recovered to take the next two and close the best-of-three series 2–1. The result sent Rostik Team forward in the upper bracket and guaranteed the roster a place at the LAN stage. Avice Team dropped to the lower bracket, where its tournament run continued rather than ending with the argument.

A technical problem also affected the deciding map, which was replayed after Dota 2 crashed. Reports noted that Rostik Team had been leading before the rehost. That is a confirmed operational detail, not evidence for either side’s accusations. A server failure can change the flow of a match, but it does not by itself demonstrate intentional play or validate claims made in chat.

The language around the dispute escalated beyond the initial allegation. Egxrdemxn and his teammate Rostislav “rostislav_999” Protasenya criticised the opposing side, and the prospect of meeting at the LAN was mentioned in hostile terms. Repeating every insult would add heat without improving the factual record. The useful account is narrower: the players argued publicly, the series was completed, and the bracket advanced according to the recorded 2–1 result.

BETBOOM Streamers Battle 15 is a media-focused competition, so player broadcasts are part of the event’s appeal. That format also makes careless allegations travel quickly. When a claim concerns competitive integrity, the appropriate next step is evidence reviewed by organisers or another competent body. The source reports did not identify such a completed review, a formal charge or a penalty arising from this exchange.

The boundary of the confirmed record

What can be stated confidently is limited but clear. Avice made the accusation during the match; egxrdemxn denied its implication and countered with criticism of Avice Team; Rostik Team won the series and reached the LAN stage. Anything beyond those points would require information that has not been published in the reviewed reports.

This boundary protects both accuracy and fairness. Competitive-integrity allegations are serious even when delivered in the informal language of a streamer event. Reporting the confrontation is legitimate because it happened in public and affected the match atmosphere. Declaring a player guilty without a ruling, betting evidence or an organiser’s statement would be a different and unsupported claim.

• Avice made the accusation during the opening game of the playoff series.
• Egxrdemxn rejected the implication and referenced Koma`’s prior Valve ban.
• Rostik Team won 2–1 and secured passage to the LAN stage.
• No formal ruling or new punishment was reported with the exchange.

Element	Confirmed status	What remains unproven
In-game exchange	Broadcast and reported by several outlets	The truth of the accusation
Series result	Rostik Team won 2–1	Any causal link to misconduct
Tournament response	No ruling reported in the reviewed material	Whether organisers will investigate

The BSB 15 dispute is news because a serious accusation was made publicly during an official series. It is not proof that match-fixing occurred. Until organisers present evidence or a ruling, the accurate description remains a heated allegation followed by a confirmed Rostik Team victory.